A Critical Review of the of National Innovation System Approach: from Conceptual Dimensions to the Policymaking Process

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Corresponding author: PhD in science and technology policymaking, Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant professor at Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The background of policymaking and decision making in systems is interwoven with the history science of management. Early approaches and theories in this field of study are mainly based on engineering and quantitative approaches, and are occupied by methods developed in the discourse of "scientific management". Yet, recent approaches in this field are taken from emerging subdivisions of management discipline containing futurology and science and technology policymaking qualitative, contain descriptive and explanatory aspects. This research is intended to have a review study of the approach of the innovation system, its discourse (and perhaps its paradigm), its elements and components, and to briefly introduce the theories developed within it, and to focus on the conceptual or policymaking dimensions, and decision-making process in this type of system. As a new approach, the innovation system contains a background of less than three decades in the history of science and technology. Hence, this study tries to investigate theoretical deficiencies in both the conceptual, scientific and technological policymaking processes, and to highlight its weaknesses. This review shows that the approach involves serious weaknesses in some of its components such as institution, disregarding strategic policies and lack of appropriate system tools. Moreover, the innovation system approach does not offer novel causal and analytical (rather than descriptive) theories for the policymaking process of science and technology.

Keywords

References

Abramovitz, M. (1986). Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind. Journal of Economic History, 46, 386-406.
Ahrens, J. (2002). Governance and the implementation of technology policy in less developed countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11(4-5), 441-476.
Anderson, J.E. (1990). Public Policymaking, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Bacon, F. (1620). Novum Organum, English translation in 1905 In R. L. Ellis & J. Spedding (Eds). The Philisophical Works of Francis Bacon (pp. 212-387). London: Routledge.
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2002). Positive and negative feedback in politics. In F. R. Baumgartner and B. D. Jones (eds), Policy dynamics (pp. 3-28). Chicago: university of Chicago press.
Baumgartner, F.R., & Jones, B.D. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Baumgartner, F.R., & Jones, B.D. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research policy, 29(4), 627-655.
Brewer, G. D., & DeLeon, P. (1983). The foundations of policy analysis. IL: Dorsey Press.
Calidoni-Lundberg, F. (2006). Evaluation: definitions, methods and models–An ITPS framework. Ostersund: Swedish Institute for Growth Policy Studies.
Cardwell, D. (1967). Some Factors in the Early Development of the Concepts of Power, Work and Energy. The British Journal for the history of science, 3(30), 209-224.
Chaminade, C., & Edquist, C. (2005). From theory to practice. The use of the systems of innovation approach in innovation policy. In J. Hage, M. de Meeus (Eds).Innovation, Learning and Institutions (pp. 141-162). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Chang, H. J. (2002). Who Need Technology Policy? Nairobi: African Technology Policy Studies Network (ATPS).
Clark, J, & Guy, K. (1997). Innovation and Competitiveness. Brighton: Technopolis.
Cobb, R. W. & Elder, C.D. (1983). Participation in American politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-building. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Cohen, M.D., March, J., & Olsen, J.P. (1972). A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.
Dodgson, M. (2000). Policies for science, technology and innovation in Asian newly industrializing economies. In L. Kim & R. R. Nelson (Eds). Technology, learning, and innovation: Experiences of newly industrializing economies (pp. 229-268). New York: Columbia university press.
Dye, T. R. (2008). Understanding public policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Edquist, C. (2001). Innovation policy–a systemic approach. In D. Archibugi and B-Å. Lundvall (Eds). The Globalizing Learning Economy (pp. 219-237). New York: Oxford University Press.   
Edquist, C. (2005). Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and organizations. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery & R. R. Nelson (Eds). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 181-208). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ergas, H. (1987). The importance of technology policy. In P. Dasgupta & P. Stoneman (Eds.), Economic Policy and Technological Performance (pp. 51-96), New York, NY: Cambridge university press. 
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy, 29(2), 109-123.
EU (European union) (2011). Evaluation-general issues. Available from: http://www.funduszestrukturalne.gov.pl/NR/rdonlyres/C81E88FA-0F99-4233-8B3A-0C9FFF2C0695/14716/Ewaluacjakwestieog%C3%B3lneen1.doc.
Fagerberg, J., & Srholec, M. (2005). Catching up: what are the critical factors for success. Working Papers on Innovation Studies (No. 0401), Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
Freeman, Ch. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance:  Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
Freeman, CH. (1995). The National System of Innovation in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 5-24
Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott, & Michael Trow (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Goggin, M.L., Bowman, A. O'M., Lester, J. & O’Toole, L.J. (1990). Implementation Theory and Practice: Towards a Third Generation. Glenview, NewYork: HarperCollins.
Green-Pedersen, C. & Mortensen, P.B. (2013). Policy agenda-setting studies; Attention, politics and the public. In E. Araral Jr., S. Fritzen, M. Howlett, M. Ramesh & X. Wu (eds). Routledge Handbook of Public Policy (pp. 167-174). New York: Routledge.
Hagendijk, R., & Kallerud, E. (2003). Changing conceptions and practices of governance in science and technology in Europe: A framework for analysis. STAGE (Science, Technology, and Governance in Europe) Discussion Paper, (2). Brussels.
Heaton, G.R., Cheney, D.W., Hill, C.T. & Suzuki, T. (1998). Perspectives on US Technology Policy, New York: Report to JETRO.
Henriques, L. & Larédo, P. (2013). Policy-making in science policy: The ‘OECD model’ unveiled. Research Policy, 42, 801–816. 
Hiriart, Y., Martimort, D., & Pouyet, J. (2010). The public management of risk: Separating ex ante and ex post monitors. Journal of Public Economics, 94(11), 1008-1019.
Hughes, T.P. (1976). The Science-Technology Interaction: The Case of High-Voltage Power Transmission Systems. Technology and Culture, 17(4), 646-662.
Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., & Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research policy, 36(5), 680-693.
JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency) (2011). Issues in Ex-ante and Ex-post Evaluation. Available from: http://www.jica.go.jp/english/operations/evaluation/tech_and_grant/guides/pdf/guideline03-02.pdf
Jones, C. O. )1970(. An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Justman, M. & Teubal, M. (1996). Technological infrastructure policy (TIP): creating capabilities and building markets. Research Policy, 24(2), 259-281.
Kim, L., & Dahlman, C. J. (1992). Technology policy for industrialization: An integrative framework and Korea's experience. Research Policy, 21(5), 437-452.
Kingdon, J.W. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
Knowles Jenny (2007). "Natural Resource Management and Livelihoods Programme, Cambodia (2006 – 2010): Draft Strategy for Monitoring and Evaluation", Phnom Penh, Royal Danish Embassy (Cambodia).
Kohlmeyer, F.W. & Herum, F.L. (1961). Sciencea nd Engineeringi n Agriculture: A Historical Perspective. Technology and Culture, 2(4), 368-380.
Kraft, M. E., & Furlong, S. R. (2004). Public policy: Politics, analysis, and alternatives. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Kusek J. Z. & Rist R. C. (2004). "Ten Steps to a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System". Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Lall, S., & Teubal, M. (1998). Market-Stimulating technology policies in developing countries: a framework with examples from East Asia. World Development, 26(8), 1369-1385.
Landes, D. (1998). The Wealth and Powerty of Nations. London: Abacus.
Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A pre-view of policy sciences. Elsevier publishing company.
Lipsey, R. & Carlaw, K. (2002). The Conceptual Basis of Technology Policy. Chapter on Technology Policy publisher's version (August 12 2002), Canada: Simon Fraser University.
Little, A.D. (1981). The Strategic Management of Technology.  Davos: European Management Forum.
Lundvall, B. Å., & Borrás, S. (1997). The globalising learning economy: Implications for innovation policy. Brussels: DG XII. 
Lundvall, B. A., & Borrás, S. (2005). Science, technology and innovation policy. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery & R. R. Nelson (Eds), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 599-631). New York: Oxford University Press.
Lundvall, B-Å. (1997, September). National systems and national styles of innovation. In Fourth International ASEAT Conference, "Differences in ‘styles’ of technological innovation", Manchester, UK.
Lundvall, B-Å. (ed.) (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London and New York: Pinter Publishers.
Mokyr, J. (2002). The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mowery, D. (1995). The practice of technology policy. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Blackwell Publishers Inc., Cambridge, MA, 513-557.
Neal, H.A., Smith, T.L. & McCormick, J.B. (2008). U.S. Science Policy in the Twenty-First Century. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Nelson, R. R. (ed.) (1993). National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nelson, R.R. & WINTER, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
OECD (1970). Manuel d’inventaire du potentiel scientifique et technique national (Manuel de Frascati). Paris: OECD.
OECD (1999). Managing National Innovation Systems, Paris: OECD.
OECD (2002). Glossary of key terms in evaluation and results based management, Paris: OECD/DAC (development assistance Committee).
OECD (2005). Governance of Innovation Systems. Volume 1(Synthesis Report), Paris: OECD.
OECD (2006). DAC evaluation quality standards. Paris: OECD/DAC (assistant Committee development).
OECD, T. (1992). Technology and the economy: the key relationships. Final Report of the Technology/Economy Programme (TEP), Paris: OECD.
Rae, J.B. (1961). Science and Engineering in the History of Aviation. Technology and Culture, 2(4), 391-39.
Ripley, R. B. (1985). Policy analysis in political science. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Rothwell, R. (1994). Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. International marketing review, 11(1), 7-31.
Sabatier, P.A. & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1999). The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment. In Paul A. Sabatier, Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 117–166). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Harvard: Harvard university press.
Stine, D. D. (2009). Science and technology policymaking: A primer. DIANE Publishing.
Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1993). Business strategy, technology policy and firm performance. Strategic management journal, 14(6), 451-478.  
Zahra, S.A. & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27, 185-94.
Journal of System Management Studies
Volume 1, Issue 2
September 2020
Pages 37-93

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics